Quantcast
Channel: SAC Capital
Viewing all 197 articles
Browse latest View live

Five Hedge Funds That Could Be Getting Whacked On The Knight Capital Implosion (KCG)

$
0
0

Steve Cohen

Shares of Knight Capital are getting spanked today on unconfirmed reports and trader chatter that an algo program at the market-maker caused some wild swings in a bunch of stocks this morning. 

Bloomberg TV reports that Knight Capital has told its clients to trade elsewhere.

Knight's stock was last down more than 24%. 

Here's a quick rundown of five hedge funds with the greatest stake in Knight, according to data compiled by Bloomberg citing 13F regulatory filing from 3/31/2012. 

  • SAC Capital (~1.8 million shares or a 1.86% stake)
  • AQR (1.24 million shares)
  • Palisade Capital Management (667,824 shares)
  • Two Sigma Investments (573,591 shares)
  • D.E. Shaw & Co. (357,776 shares)

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Five Hedge Funds That Are Crushing It So Far This Year

$
0
0

David Einhorn

CNBC's Kate Kelly has a list of hedge funds that are outperforming their peers so far this year. 

Here's a round up of their YTD performance as of 8/31: 

SEE ALSO: Leon Cooperman's Omega Advisors Is Up 22% YTD >

Watch the CNBC video below:  

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Fifth SAC Trader Has Been Named In The Big Insider Trading Probe

$
0
0

steve cohen

A fifth person from Steve Cohen's SAC Capital Advisors has been tied to a sweeping insider trading probe by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office and the FBI, Bloomberg News' Patricia Hurtado and Katherine Burton report.

According to the report, which cites unnamed sources, Michael Steinberg, a 40-year-old tech-fund manager at SAC's Capital New York division, Sigma Capital Management, was named as an "unindicted co-conspirator"  in court papers for the securities fraud case of Jon Horvath.

Steinberg is the portfolio manager Horvath reported to while at SAC.

Prosecutors allege that Horvath, a former SAC analyst, and co-defendants Anthony Chiasson, the co-founder of Level Global, and Todd Newman, an ex-Diamondback Capital portfolio manager, were able to reap millions by trading on inside information in Dell and Nvidia stocks between 2007 and 2009.

They were all charged back in January.  

So far, Steinberg hasn't been charged with any wrongdoing himself.

Bloomberg News also reports the names other people from SAC who have been tied to insider trading as part of the wide-sweeping probe.  They include former SAC fund managers Noah Freeman and Donald Longueil as well as former SAC analyst Jonathan Hollander. Their cases were different, though. 

Read the full report at Bloomberg here >

SEE ALSO: Meet Michael Steinberg >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

What Does It Mean That An SAC Capital Manager Is An 'Unindicted Co-Conspirator' In An Insider Trading Scheme?

$
0
0

Preet Bharara

The Street is buzzing today about the news that a fund manager from SAC Capital has been named as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in the sweeping insider trading probe by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office and the FBI.  

Michael Steinberg, a 40-year-old tech-fund manager at SAC's Capital New York division, Sigma Capital Management, was first identified as an "unindicted co-conspirator" by Bloomberg News in a revised indictment for the securities fraud case of Jon Horvath.  (Steinberg's name was redacted, but Bloomberg was able to figure it out.) 

It's important to remember that Steinberg has not been charged.  

For a clear explanation of what this means we talked to Stephen Bainbridge, professor of law at UCLA, who is an expert on securities law.

First, Bainbridge explained to us that the indictment alleges a conspiracy.  In other words, a number of people acting together in furtherance of a criminal enterprise.  

This, he explained, means this person, the unindicted co-conspirator, is someone the prosecutor is naming as having been part of the conspiracy. However, for any number of reasons, the prosecutor has decided not to charge this individual (at least not at this time). 

There could be a number of reasons why, he told us.

One possibility is the unindicted co-conspirator could be a corroborating witness who is going to get immunity from prosecution in exchange for testimony.

Another is when an entity is named as an unindicted co-conspirator there may be evidentiary reasons where the prosecutor thinks this person is part of the scheme, but not sure they can prove it at trial, he said.  

Bainbridge added that this person may have also engaged in active plea bargaining.  

Steinberg wasn't explicitly named in the indictment, but Bloomberg News was able to figure out that he was the "portfolio manager whom Jon Horvath reported at his hedge fund." 

There are a lot of different reasons why the individual is identified as a co-conspirator, but not named explicitly in the indictment. 

According to Bainbridge, it's typically regarded as bad form to identify an unindicted co-conspirator in an indictment by name.  

There are a lot of reasons why the prosecution wouldn't identify an unindicted co-conspirator, he said.  For instance, that person could be a potential corroborating witness.  They could also be in the middle of plea negotiations.

Sometimes they are named in the indictment, though. 

"It's often the case that the prosecutor will decide there are some defendants, for whatever reason, they don't want press charges against.  Yet, they will name the person in the indictment as a co-conspirator because, even though they aren't going to charge them, they need to in the indictment, identify who wall the members of the conspiracy were in the event that the case does go to trial.  Part of the proof would be to prove the full extent of the conspiracy."  

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

An Ex-SAC Capital Analyst Pleads Guilty To Insider Trading

$
0
0

Steve Cohen

Jon Horvath, a former tech analyst for Steven Cohen's $14 billion SAC Capital hedge fund has pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and two counts of securities fraud, Bloomberg's Patricia Hurtado reports.

Last week, one of Horvath's former supervisors at SAC, Michael Steinberg was named an unindicted co-conspirator in Horvath's case. Horvath is reportedly cooperating with authorities and faces a maximum of 47 years in prison as well as the prospect of deportation, as he is a Swedish citizen.

From Bloomberg:

“I was part of a group of analysts who agreed to obtain and share information about public companies,” Horvath said today during his plea. “Some of the information I received was material nonpublic information which I knew came from public company employees and I knew they were not permitted to disclose or share with outsiders.”

Horvath is being charged with Anthony Chiasson formerly of hedge fund Level Global and Todd Newman formerly of hedge fund Diamondback Capital. The analysts allegedly obtained non-public information on tech companies Dell and Nvidia.

In a statement, SAC said that it is "disappointed" to hear of Horvath's guilty plea (from Bloomberg):

“Until today, Mr. Horvath maintained he had not violated the law and we gave him the benefit of the presumption of innocence,” SAC said in a statement issued after the plea today. “We are disappointed and angered to learn Mr. Horvath admittedly violated the law and SAC’s policies forbidding insider trading. We expect our employees to have integrity, play by the rules and follow the letter and spirit of the law.”

Neither SAC Capital nor Steven Cohen have been charged with any wrong-doing in this case.

Read the full story at Bloomberg>

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

FORMER SAC CAPITAL MANAGER TELLS FBI: Fund Used Inside Information

$
0
0

Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) -- A former SAC Capital Advisors LP portfolio manager told the FBI it was “understood” that those assigned to give their best trading ideas to founder Steven A. Cohen would provide him with insider information, according to an agent’s notes of the conversation.

The former fund manager, Noah Freeman, pleaded guilty to securities fraud in February 2011 after speaking to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and federal prosecutors in New York in late 2010, in a so-called proffer session. Defendants use such sessions to determine whether to cooperate with the government against others.

“At SAC Capital you were expected to provide your trading ideas to Cohen,” Freeman said, according to a Dec. 16, 2010, memo written by FBI Special Agent B.J. Kang. “Freeman and others at SAC Capital understood that providing Cohen with your best trading ideas involved providing Cohen with inside information.”

Freeman, one of five current or former SAC portfolio managers or analysts implicated in insider trading, isn’t quoted as saying Cohen, 56, knew the information came from illegally obtained tips, ordered him to provide them or traded on the data. Neither Cohen nor Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC Capital, which manages $14 billion in assets, has been accused of criminal or civil wrongdoing.

Michael Steinberg, a portfolio manager at SAC’s Sigma Capital Management unit implicated in insider trading, has been placed on leave by SAC, a person familiar with the matter said. He is an unindicted co-conspirator related to the case against Jon Horvath, a former SAC analyst he supervised, people familiar with the case said last week.

 

’Criminal Club’

 

Horvath pleaded guilty Sept. 28 to being part of a “criminal club” of fund managers and analysts who made $62 million by swapping nonpublic information about technology companies. Steinberg hasn’t been charged with a crime.

Freeman and another SAC fund manager, Donald Longueuil, were accused last year by prosecutors in the office of Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara with being part of an insider- trading scheme while at SAC.

Freeman, Longueuil and two others charged in the case have pleaded guilty to criminal insider-trading charges. Longueuil, 36, is serving a 2 1/2-year prison term at the federal prison in Otisville, New York. Freeman is cooperating with prosecutors and hasn’t been sentenced.

 

Harvard, Portfolio

 

Freeman, 36, a 1999 Harvard College graduate who said he once managed a $300 million portfolio of technology stocks at SAC, spoke at length with the FBI about insider trading, according to excerpts of his interviews, which were filed in federal court in New York by Winifred Jiau. Jiau, a former consultant with Primary Global Research LLC, was convicted last year of insider trading and is challenging her conviction.

At one point in his career at SAC, Freeman, who worked in the firm’s Boston office, said he sat next to Cohen.

“Freeman pitched to Cohen many trading ideas over the 18 months he was at SAC and some of the trading ideas involved dirty information,” according to the memo by Kang, who was a New York-based agent at the time. Kang in 2009 arrested Galleon Group LLC co-founder Raj Rajaratnam on insider-trading charges.

Cohen, who started SAC in 1992 after leaving Gruntal & Co., a New York brokerage firm, was deposed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year over whether he illegally bought and sold stocks using inside information, two people familiar with the matter said in June.

 

Cohen Questioned

 

Cohen was questioned by the SEC about trades made close to news, such as mergers announcements and earnings results that generated profits for his fund, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the investigation isn’t public.

“Mr. Freeman testified under oath that he went to great lengths to hide his illicit activities from SAC by, for example, using code words and communicating off of firm systems,” Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for SAC, said in a statement. “His testimony makes clear that SAC did not condone his activities.”

Benjamin Rosenberg, a lawyer for Freeman, declined to comment on the memos filed about his client. U.S. Attorney spokeswoman Ellen Davis also declined to comment, as did FBI spokesman Jim Margolin.

Steinberg’s lawyer, Barry Berke, declined to comment on his client’s status at SAC. Steve Peikin, a lawyer for Horvath, didn’t return a voice-mail message left at his office seeking comment on Steinberg.

 

Hearsay Accounts

 

Brad Simon, a former federal prosecutor who now has a white-collar criminal defense practice in New York, said FBI memos like the one about Freeman aren’t taken under oath and aren’t admissible at trial because they’re “hearsay” -- second-hand accounts that can’t be cross-examined.

Still, Simon said, the fact that prosecutors used Freeman as a cooperating witness against Jiau indicates they believed him. Lying to federal investigators in such situations can constitute a felony.

“By ultimately giving Freeman a cooperating agreement the government made a determination in their view that what he said was true,” Simon said. “Otherwise they wouldn’t have signed him up.”

Freeman’s FBI interviews are much more extensive about what he said he did while at SAC than his testimony at Jiau’s trial. Freeman’s account at the trial, while under oath, was also narrowly focused upon his interactions with Jiau. He told jurors he made millions of dollars by trading on illegal tips he got from Jiau and said obtained “perfect” material, nonpublic information from her about Nvidia Corp. and Marvell Technology Group Ltd.

 

Barai Arrangement

 

Freeman also testified he never told SAC Capital superiors about his secret arrangement with Samir Barai, who ran his own hedge fund and would later plead guilty to insider trading, and Longueuil, saying that “SAC had compliance policies and we wouldn’t have been allowed to.”

Some legal experts said that Freeman’s account of trading while at SAC has already attracted the attention of U.S. investigators.

“Regardless of what’s in those FBI 302s, the government believed Freeman to be a truthful witness,” Simon said, referring to the name the bureau uses for its summary notes of such interviews. “Whether the 302s are accurate or not, the government came to the conclusion that he is a truthful witness because they offered him a cooperating agreement. If they’d decided something in those reports was a lie, they wouldn’t have offered it to him. Instead, he’d be the subject of his own prosecution.”

 

‘His Own Neck’

 

U.S. investigators would be obligated to scrutinize allegations of wrongdoing by a cooperator, even one who’s trying to minimize his wrongdoing by implicating others, said Anthony Sabino, a law professor at St. John’s University in New York.

“On one hand the speaker is trying to save his own neck, and bolster his own position with the government” Sabino said.

“But it’d be hard to imagine that it sounds like good news for anyone who’s mentioned in an FBI memo like this,” Sabino said. “You don’t know if the government is going after them, but in the post-Madoff era, the government is very likely to look at such a prominent individual.”

The cases against individuals at SAC indicates that investigators are “looking to work up the chain,” Simon said. “The government usually makes their cases by putting pressure on lower-level employees in the hopes that they’ll help them make cases against higher-ups.”

 

Cohen Account

 

SAC Capital drew attention in May 2011 when U.S. Senator Charles Grassley asked the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry’s self-regulatory body, to provide information on the “potential scope of suspicious trading activity” by the firm.

Freeman’s statements to the FBI may also indicate why U.S. prosecutors scrutinized the “Cohen Account.”

The “Cohen Account” consists of the best trading ideas unearthed by SAC’s teams. Portfolio managers and analysts submit their stock picks to Cohen and his team, and if he uses them in his account -- and they make money -- they get paid for their idea.

“At SAC Capital you were paid a percentage of Cohen’s trade if Cohen placed a trade based on your tip,” Freeman said, according to the Kang memo. “It was clear to Freeman that to survive at SAC Capital, you had to feed Cohen with trading tips.”

 

Recovered Records

 

In a March 24, 2011, letter filed in Longueuil’s insider- trading case, federal prosecutors said they had recovered records from SAC and listed documents tied to the “Cohen Account.”

Longueuil pleaded guilty in April 2011, to participating in an insider-trading scheme while working at SAC from June 2008 until January 2010.

Cohen said last year that he promoted four traders in 2010 as industry-group heads, including technology, to help run the Cohen Account. Cohen made the promotions because he “couldn’t get to everybody and was highly inefficient,” he told a conference in Las Vegas in May last year.

“A management consultant would tell you to only have eight to 10 points of contact,” Cohen said. “I had hundreds.”

 

‘Perfect Hedge’

 

Freeman was eventually persuaded to cooperate in a federal law enforcement initiative by Bharara’s office and the FBI in New York called “Perfect Hedge,” which was created to combat insider trading at hedge funds.

“The defendant has informed the government of potential violations of law by the defendant and others,” according to a proffer agreement Freeman made with the U.S. in a separate December 2010 document filed with the court by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Avi Weitzman and David Leibowitz and Freeman’s lawyer, Ben Rosenberg.

In that document, Freeman agreed to work for the FBI, “including participating in monitored/and or recorded telephone conversations and meetings with the intention of providing the government with additional information regarding these violations of law,” according to court papers filed by Jiau in her case.

When Freeman testified as a prosecution witness last year at Jiau’s trial, he told jurors he’d recorded telephone conversations and also wore a body wire for the FBI when he spoke and met with Longueuil, who’d been his co-conspirator and best man at his wedding.

 

Sonar Capital

 

Freeman told jurors he’d committed insider trading while working both at SAC and at his prior firm, Sonar Capital Management LLC , on at least 18 occasions and informed upon “more than a dozen” people.

Jiau’s jury was shown an undated photo of Freeman, Longueuil and Barai standing together, smiling broadly, on a city street. Freeman said he had met Longueuil at a speed skating club in Boston and later befriended Barai. As a result of their arrest, the three men’s friendship “ceased to exist,” he said.

Legal experts cautioned that federal investigations usually take time and with new guilty pleas, such as the plea by Horvath, there is renewed exposure.

“While there’s no way to know if Mr. Cohen is or isn’t a target, the bottom line is this is obviously an ongoing investigation,” Sabino, the law professor said. “Everyone is at risk, not just someone like Cohen or people who worked at SAC, but anyone who’s dipped their toe into the pool of insider trading better watch out as more people plead guilty and agree to cooperate.”

The Horvath case is U.S. v. Newman, 12-cr-00124, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).


--With assistance from Katherine Burton in New York. Editors: Patrick Oster, Michael Hytha

 

To contact the reporters on this story: Patricia Hurtado in New York at pathurtado@bloomberg.net Saijel Kishan in New York at skishan@bloomberg.net.

 

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net; Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A Former Broker For SAC Capital Gives His Take On The Latest Insider Trading Case

$
0
0

Steve Cohen Vanity Fair small

I covered the mortgage bond side of SAC Capital in the early 2000s, and I remember half-kidding, half-probing my client about Steven A Cohen’s seeming inability to miss.  Back then Cohen’s SAC had put together a string of annual monster returns like no other hedge fund.[1]  Cohen’s SAC Capital was the Mark McGuire of stock trading, and we knew enough to think the home run records of 1998 looked mighty suspicious.

My client was one of the nicest and most straight-forward men I ever worked with, and his team of bond portfolio managers were really not the beating heart of SAC’s fund, which at its core was a high volume, stock-trading firm.

My client honorably defended his employer Cohen, marveling at his ability to stand in the middle of his trading floor in Stamford, CT and synthesize all the trading inputs and react unerringly with his ‘feel’ for the markets.

SAC was known then to produce an inordinate amount of volume on the NYSE for just one fund,[2] making Cohen’s fund the top equity client for a number of broker-dealers who earned extraordinarily high commissions on his stock trading.  The implication of high volume like this, at the time, was that a top client like SAC could command top coverage from the Street.

According to the honest way of looking at things, this meant SAC might receive a phone call,[3] tip-off, or access to the Street’s best research ideas, first.

According to the dishonest way of looking at things, this meant SAC might get information that nobody else had access to, possibly – unethically – the client-flows of rival funds, or – illegally – straight-up insider information.

With yesterday’s accusation of one of SAC’s portfolio managers, we have what some believe to be the first major chink in the armor of Steven Cohen’s code of silence around his trading success.

This has got me thinking again about hedge fund cheaters and too-good-to-be-true results.

The first investing lesson of the Madoff scheme was this: If your hedge fund manager is flawless, if he never endures a down month, if he beats the competition month after month and year after year, then he’s not a genius, he’s a crook.  Real investing sometimes involves losses, and sometimes involves volatility.  Fake investing by contrast offers you steady, non-volatile wins every month.  Until all the money’s gone.

The second investing lesson of the Madoff scandal was that investors will look the other way with their own crooked hedge fund manager, if they think it benefits them.  Investors turned out to be wrong about Madoff (he wasn’t cheating on their behalf!) but many people inside the financial community have long wondered if SAC fits in this category of acceptable cheaters.

Insider trading is a kind of ‘everybody wins’ cheating[4] that investors hope benefits them, so they are willing to not ask too many questions.

Steven A Cohen’s unrivaled success over the years brought the unwelcome attention of securities crime prosecutors long ago, as the Lance Armstrong of the hedge fund world.

As we learn more about Cohen’s proximity to insider trading, the parallels with Armstrong hold.  Armstrong enforced a code of silence among his fellow riders for nearly ten years at the top of the cycling world, as who wants to be the first Judas to admit the whole operation depends on cheating?  Too many people’s livelihoods depended on maintaining appearances and not asking questions.

Cheating on the kind of scale of Armstrong, or the SAC scale, however, involves so many people that eventually a few can be peeled away to talk to prosecutors.  Based really on a gut feeling, and on no particular personal knowledge of the situation over the years, I wouldn’t be surprised if Steven Cohen eventually gets his 7 Tour de France titles taken away as well.


 


[1] With the possible exception of Jim Simonds’ Renaissance Fund, but that managed no outside money.

[2] This was ten years ago, and SAC was alleged to generate 25% of equity commissions on the NYSE.  These days, its all run by Skynet so I can’t believe any one fund could have that kind of influence.

[3] Back when, you know, people used phones.  It’s all so quaint.

[4] It’s not really ‘everybody wins,’ it’s just that winning is concentrated in the hands of a few interested parties with quantifiable benefits, while losing is diffusely shared by the entire system of unknowing, losing, participants.  Kind of like tax loopholes.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

A New Report Is The Clearest Sign Yet That Authorities Are Trying To Nab Stevie Cohen

$
0
0

steve cohen watercolor

Well there it is: The clearest evidence yet that prosecutors are trying to pursue hedge fund manager Stevie Cohen for insider trading.

WSJ's Michael Rothfeld and Chad Bray report:

A year before the government charged Mathew Martoma with insider trading, it tried to get him to turn against his former boss, Steven A. Cohen.

Federal agents, including Federal Bureau of Investigation case agent Matthew T. Callahan, turned up at the Boca Raton, Fla., home of Mr. Martoma, a former portfolio manager at an affiliate of SAC Capital Advisors L.P. Agents tried and failed to persuade him to be a cooperating witness in the government's effort to build a criminal case against Mr. Cohen, the founder of SAC and one of the biggest names in the hedge-fund world, said people close to the case.

This case was revealed earlier this week, as both the SEC and FBI brought chargest against Martoma relating to $250 million in allegedly ill-gotten gains.

The complaint was littered with references to an un-named 'Portfolio Manager A' who was reported to be Cohen, a strong point of evidence that investigators were seeking to tie Cohen to allegedly illegal trades.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Everything You Need To Know About Accused Insider Trader Mathew Martoma

$
0
0

harvard law school

Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Mathew Martoma got off to a slow start in the hedge-fund world.

A former student at Harvard Law School, he co-wrote papers on medical ethics before seeking a business degree at Stanford University and joining a little-known Boston hedge fund. Former colleagues say he was nondescript, and other hedge-fund managers never heard of him.

Yet in 2006, at age 32, Martoma made it to SAC Capital Advisors LP and gained the attention of the firm’s billionaire owner Steven A. Cohen. Cohen, one of the most successful hedge- fund managers in the world, trusted Martoma’s recommendations enough to accumulate about $700 million in shares of Elan Corp. and Wyeth LLC two years later and then sell them all within a week after Martoma had changed his view on the companies.

Those recommendations, which earned the young portfolio manager a $9.38 million bonus, have now landed Martoma at the center of what U.S. prosecutors describe as the most-lucrative insider-trading scheme they’ve ever uncovered, with profits and averted losses of $276 million. Early in the morning of Nov. 20, FBI agents arrested the 38-year-old at his Boca Raton home. The charges against him mark the first time prosecutors said Cohen had talked with a defendant about stocks in an insider-trading case, pulling the art collector deeper into one of the biggest investigations of securities fraud in history.

“Mathew Martoma was an exceptional portfolio manager who succeeded through hard work and the dogged pursuit of information in the public domain,” his lawyer Charles Stillman said in an e-mailed statement, adding that he expected Martoma to be fully exonerated.

 

Florida Youth

 

Martoma grew up in Florida, according to social security and voter registration records. As an 18-year-old, he lived in Merritt Island, Florida, less than 10 miles from Cape Canaveral, where NASA’s Kennedy Space Center is located. His mother, Lizzie Thomas, was a doctor, according to public records. His father, Bobby Martoma, owned a dry cleaner until two years ago.

Mathew Martoma got his undergraduate degree at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, according to the university registrar. During his first year, he was inducted into Phi Eta Sigma, an honors society for freshmen who attain at least a 3.5 grade point average, according to the university registrar. He graduated in December 1995.

Less than two years later, he went off to Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He wrote two medical-ethics papers, one of which identifies him as a member of Harvard Law’s class of 2000 and as the former deputy director of the National Human Genome Research Institute’s Office of Genome Ethics.

 

Hedge-Fund Start

 

He left Harvard in December 1998 without attaining a degree, according to the school’s registrar, and attended Stanford Business School, where he joined three alumni groups including MBA Class of 2003, according to university records.

In 2001, he changed his name from Ajai Mathew Mariamdani Thomas, according to the clerk of the circuit and county court in Brevard County, Florida. His father had changed his name to Martoma from Thomas two years before.

In 2003, the year Martoma got married, he joined Boston- based Sirios Capital Management LP as a research analyst, according to public records. Sirios, a stock hedge fund co- founded by John Brennan in 1999, managed $1 billion as of June 30. He stayed there until 2006, when he moved to SAC’s CR Intrinsic unit, based in Stamford, Connecticut.

 

‘Elan Guy’

 

Former colleagues, who asked not to be named because the fund is private, said the Martoma, who stood almost six feet tall, had a quiet demeanor and left little impression except for an outsized trade that earned him the name “the Elan guy.”

As part of his job investing in health-care stocks, Martoma began talking to Sidney Gilman, a doctor involved in the trials of the experimental Alzheimer’s drug being developed my Elan and Wyeth, according to the complaints. Gilman eventually shared inside information on test results of an experimental Alzheimer drug with Martoma, according to prosecutors and the SEC, which has sued both men.

Based on Gilman’s inside information, Martoma built up stakes in the two companies and persuaded Cohen to do the same for the account he runs at SAC, the government said in the court papers. Cohen ignored some of his other analysts who thought the Elan position was too risky, saying he had confidence in Martoma’s views because he was “closest” to the drug trial, according to the criminal complaint, which cited a March 28, 2008, instant message from Cohen.

 

Last Bonus

 

By the end of June 2008, the hedge fund had amassed $328 million of shares of Elan and $373 million of Wyeth, according to the criminal complaint. The next month, the U.S. alleged in its its complaint, Gilman tipped off Martoma that the drug trial results would be disappointing. SAC sold off its entire holdings, worth about $700 million, and then bet against the two stocks, which slumped after the results were made public. The hedge fund made $76.2 million on the short sales, the government said.

“Mr. Cohen and SAC are confident that they have acted appropriately and will continue to cooperate with the government’s inquiry,” Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for the $14 billion firm, said in a Nov. 21 statement.

Gilman has entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. government, according to his lawyer, Marc Mukasey. He is cooperating with the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s office, the lawyer said.

Martoma’s bonus in 2008 was his last. He lost money in 2009 and 2010, and his employment was terminated that September after a SAC executive called him a “one-trick pony with Elan,” according to the complaint.

 

Family Foundation

 

Martoma and his wife Rosemary, a pediatrician, moved to Boca Raton, to take care of family matters, said a person familiar with him.

He spent part of his bonus on their $1.9 million, five- bedroom home, complete with six-and-a-half bathrooms, a pool, an elevator and a fake lawn out front. They started a family foundation with $1 million. Martoma tried to start a securities business. His wife registered with the state to practice medicine, according to public records.

Neighbors, who asked not to be named, said the couple have three children and have kept to themselves. They are rarely seen and aren’t members of the local country club.

Martoma is free on $5 million bail co-signed by his in- laws. He’s ordered to appear in Manhattan federal court on Nov. 26 at 10 AM.

 

--With assistance from Bill Faries in Miami and Saumya Vaishampayan, David Glovin, Devin Banerjee, Sasha Damouni, Patricia Hurtado, Max Abelson and Donal Griffin in New York. Editors: Christian Baumgaertel, Andrew Dunn

 

To contact the reporters on this story: Katherine Burton in New York at kburton@bloomberg.net; Saijel Kishan in New York at skishan@bloomberg.net; Bob Van Voris in New York at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net

 

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net; David E. Rovella at drovella@bloomberg.net


Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

First Photo Of Accused Insider Trader Mathew Martoma

$
0
0

Last week, federal authorities charged former SAC portfolio manager Mathew Martoma in what is believed to be "the most lucrative" insider trading scheme ever. 

He was arrested by FBI agents in his Florida home and he's appearing in federal court in Manhattan today.

Now we can finally see what he looks like. Check it out below [via CNBC screenshots]:

martoma 

Martoma

martoma

Federal authorities allege that Martoma traded on non-public information about drug trials at Elan Corporation and Wyeth between 2006 and 2008 while he was employed at CR Intrinsic Investors, a subsidiary of SAC Capital Advisors.  

The scheme is alleged to have made more than $276 million in ill-gotten gains.

SEE: Colleague Of Accused Insider Trader Mathew Martoma Called Him A 'One Trick Pony' In An Email Saying He Should Be Fired >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's What Happened During Accused Insider Trader Mathew Martoma's Court Appearance Today

$
0
0

Nov. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Former SAC Capital Advisors LP portfolio manager Mathew Martoma, charged in what prosecutors called the biggest-ever insider trading case, appeared in federal court in New York.

Martoma, 38, is accused of using illegal tips about a clinical trial of an Alzheimer’s disease drug to help SAC, the hedge-fund company founded by Steven A. Cohen, make $276 million on shares of Elan Corp. and Wyeth LLC. He was arrested at his Boca Raton, Florida, home Nov. 20 and freed on $5 million bond. He appeared today before U.S. Magistrate Judge James Cott in Manhattan.

The defense and prosecution today agreed to a modified bail package under which the $5 million bond must be secured by $2 million in cash or property, as well as signatures from three instead of two financially responsible people. Martoma, who surrendered his and his children’s travel documents, is limited to Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey and parts of New York.

The defendant, wearing a gray jacket, dark pants, a sweater and tie, was accompanied by his wife, Rosemary. He didn’t speak during the 13-minute court appearance except to tell the judge he understood he could be arrested if he violates the bail terms. Martoma, holding hands with his wife, emerged from the courtroom after the proceeding into a crowd of reporters.

Twenty Years

He is charged with conspiracy and two counts of securities fraud, a crime that carries a maximum 20-year prison term. Defense lawyer Charles Stillman has said he expects his client to be exonerated.

Before and after the court appearance, Martoma and his wife chatted with defense lawyers, smiling. Rosemary Martoma, a pediatrician, sat straight-backed as she listened to Cott and the lawyers discuss bail. At the end of the hearing, picking up their coats and bags, she joked “I’m the bag lady.”

Martoma was allowed to remain free today on his signature and that of his wife. The judge set the next court appearance for Dec. 26. Stillman said the parties may agree to change the date.

“We took care of business today and we’ll be back another day,” Stillman said outside court.

The government says Martoma got tips about the drug, bapineuzumab, from Dr. Sidney Gilman, an 80-year-old University of Michigan neurologist who was overseeing part of the trial. Prosecutors have reached a non-prosecution agreement with Gilman, who is cooperating with the investigation.

SAC Founder

Prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has sued Martoma, have linked SAC founder Cohen to the case, although he isn’t identified by name in their complaints. A person familiar with the matter said Cohen is the person identified in the criminal complaint as “Hedge Fund Owner” and in the SEC’s suit as “Investment Advisor A.”

Martoma denies wrongdoing, and Cohen hasn’t been sued or charged. A spokesman for the SAC founder, Jonathan Gasthalter, has denied any wrongdoing and said Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC is cooperating with the government.

The criminal case is U.S. v. Martoma, 12-mj-02985; and the civil case is SEC v. CR Intrinsic Investors LLC, 12-08466, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

--Editors: Andrew Dunn, Charles Carter

To contact the reporters on this story: Bob Van Voris in Manhattan federal court, at rvanvoris@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in Manhattan federal court, at To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

SAC Received A Wells Notice From The SEC Last Week

$
0
0

steve cohen

Billionaire Steve Cohen's SAC Capital Advisors received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission last week, CNBC's Kate Kelly reports.

According the report, the Wells Notice indicated that SAC could face civil charges. 

UPDATE:Bloomberg News reports that the Wells Notice does not name Cohen.

SAC held a conference call this morning with clients in the wake of the charges last week against former portfolio manager Mathew Martoma, who worked at CR Intrinsic, a subsidiary of SAC.

During the call, SAC's management told investors that they would be responsible for all costs or any penalties, CNBC reports. 

Kelly also reports that Cohen, who opened the call this morning, told investors that he's confident he acted appropriately and he takes these matters very seriously. 

SEE: Colleague Of Accused Insider Trader Mathew Martoma Called Him A 'One Trick Pony' In An Email Saying He Should Be Fired> 

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

REPORT: SEC Could Extend Claims To Steve Cohen Himself

$
0
0

Steve Cohen

This headline just breaking from Bloomberg News...

SAC SAID TO CONSIDER EXTENDING CLAIMS AGAINST SAC TO COHEN. 

During a conference call with investors this morning, SAC Capital Advisors disclosed that it had received a Wells Notice from the SEC, CNBC's Kate Kelly reported. The Wells Notice indicates that SAC may face civil charges.  

Steve Cohen was not mentioned in the SEC notice, Bloomberg News reported earlier. 

Last week, former SAC portfolio manager Mathew Martoma was arrested and charged with what's believed to be the "most lucrative" insider trading scheme of all time.  Martoma was employed at CR Intrinsic, a subsidiary of SAC.

Cohen told investors on the call this morning that he's confident he acted appropriately and takes this matters very seriously, according to CNBC.

SEE: SAC Received A Wells Notice From The SEC >

SEE ALSO: REPORT: Steve Cohen Is 'Portfolio Manager A' In The Latest Insider Trading Case >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

The 'Head Trader' In The Biggest Insider Trading Case Has Been Identified

$
0
0

Nov. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Phillipp Villhauer was the head trader at SAC Capital Advisors LP who allegedly helped the firm founded by Steven A. Cohen make $276 million on trades that led to the arrest of an ex-hedge fund manager for insider-trading, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Villhauer is referred to only as the “Head Trader” in a Securities and Exchange Commission complaint filed Nov. 20 in Manhattan federal court against Mathew Martoma, said the people, who declined to be identified because the matter isn’t public. He is referred to in an FBI complaint filed that same day as the “Senior Trader.” Martoma denies wrongdoing. Villhauer hasn’t been charged or sued.

“If this trader is not a cooperator, he is or soon will be in the government’s crosshairs,” said Andrew Frisch, a New York attorney and former federal prosecutor who isn’t involved in the case. “The government will see him as either a potential cooperator against others or as a worthy target by himself.”

Villhauer didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment. Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC, the $14 billion hedge fund founded by Cohen; Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in New York; and John Nester, an SEC spokesman, all declined to comment.

The day the SEC sued Martoma, the agency told SAC it may sue the firm for fraud over the trades, according to three people familiar with the matter. The SEC’s so-called Wells notice cited fraud and control-person liability over SAC’s management of CR Intrinsic Investors LLC, the unit where Martoma worked, according to one of the people.

Illegal Tips

Martoma, 38, is accused of using illegal tips in 2008 he gleaned from a University of Michigan neurologist about a clinical trial of an Alzheimer’s disease drug developed by Dublin-based Elan Corp. and Wyeth LLC, now owned by New York- based Pfizer Inc. The doctor, Sidney Gilman, leaked data on the trial to Martoma, who advised Cohen on whether SAC should buy or sell Elan and Wyeth shares, the SEC said. Gilman is cooperating with the probe.

SAC had built a $700 million position in Elan and Wyeth by July 2008, when Gilman told Martoma that the drug didn’t perform well in the clinical trial, according to the regulator. On Sunday, July 20, Martoma and Cohen spoke for 20 minutes, according to the government.

On Monday, July 21, Cohen and Martoma instructed SAC’s senior trader to “begin selling the Elan position, and to do so in a way so as to not alert anyone else, inside or outside of the hedge fund,” according to the FBI complaint filed against Martoma. Cohen isn’t named in the filing, which refers to him as the “Hedge Fund Owner,” or the SEC complaint, which calls him “Investment Advisor A.”

Dark Pools

By day’s end, the head trader e-mailed Martoma to say he sold 1.5 million shares of Elan and “obviously no one knows except you me and” Cohen, the government said. The head trader used algorithms, or programs that disguise orders and keep them from being exploited by faster traders. He also used dark pools, or exchanges that hide the identity of the buyers and sellers to execute the trades, according to the SEC.

The next weekend, Cohen received an e-mail from the head trader saying the firm sold 10.5 million shares of Elan at an average price of $34.21.

“This was executed quietly and effectively over a 4 day period through algos and darkpools and booked into two firm accounts that have very limited viewing access,” according to the e-mail, the FBI said. “This process clearly stopped leakage of info from either in [or] outside the firm and in my viewpoint saved us some slippage.”

Elan Shares

On Monday, July 28, after selling all of its Elan shares, SAC shorted about 4.5 million more shares over the next two days, authorities said. The firm, having sold all of its Wyeth shares, also shorted about 3.25 million shares of that stock.

Over the preceding week, the firm’s trading of securities represented 20 percent of the reported Elan trading volume, and 11 percent of the reported trading volume in Wyeth stock.

After the market closed, Elan and Wyeth released the drug trial results to investors and analysts. By the next day, Elan shares fell 42 percent and Wyeth shares fell 12 percent. Analysts cited the fact that patients didn’t improve on the drug.

As a result, SAC gained profit and averted losses of $220 million on Elan and $56 million on Wyeth, the SEC said.

 

Awarded Bonus

 

The following January, Martoma was awarded a bonus of $9.38 million for his work over the previous year, based largely on the results for Elan and Wyeth, the government said. He received no bonus for his work in 2009.

By May 5, 2010, the U.S. said an SAC employee recommended that Martoma be fired after losing money, saying he appeared to be a “one trick pony with Elan.” He was fired.

The criminal case is U.S. v. Martoma, 12-mj-02985; and the civil case is SEC v. CR Intrinsic Investors LLC, 12-08466, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

--With assistance from Katherine Burton, Saijel Kishan and Kelly Bit in New York and Joshua Gallu in Washington. Editors: Patrick Oster, David E. Rovella

To contact the reporters on this story: David Voreacos in Newark, New Jersey at dvoreacos@bloomberg.net; David Glovin in New York at dglovin@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net.


Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

My Interview At SAC Capital Included An Awkward Discussion About Insider Trading

$
0
0

Denise Shull is President of The ReThink Group, a consultancy providing advanced market, risk and behavioral intelligence. She holds a Master’s degree in Neuropsychology from The University of ChicagoThese are her musings and impressions of what happened during one afternoon she spent at SAC Capital Advisors for a job interview:   

Personally, I’ve never been into art, but while I sat in the lobby of SAC Capital unable to take my eyes off the gargantuan gleaming purple heart hanging high above me, I realized I should probably reconsider.  

After being referred to the firm by two trading psychologists, I’d been discussing a “Management Consultant/Executive Coach” position with Jordana Upton, a Vice President in HR at SAC. I found myself  curious about the origins of an Addams family-suitable gothic basketball hoop while waiting to be interviewed by Mr. Cohen’s Chief of Staff, Marshall Kiev, and Perry Boyle who I understood to be the Director of Research and member of the Executive committee.

The job description I had received read:  "The Management Consultant/Executive Coach is a newly created position which will report to the Firm’s President, with frequent dialog with other members of senior management. The purpose of the role is to work one-on-one with our discretionary long/short equity portfolio managers to help them identify the traits and behaviors that hold them back from performing at their full potential and come up with strategies to achieve success.  The consultant will then work with the portfolio managers to implement and monitor progress against those strategies."

I didn’t pay much attention to the end of the first sentence – "with frequent dialog with other members of senior management" and focused on the purpose of one-on-one work. Frankly, I’m not the least bit reticent about my ability to "identify", "come up with strategies" and "implement" in this realm. 

Unfortunately for me but maybe fortunately for SAC, that first sentence turned out to be the key. First with Messrs. Boyle and Kiev, the subject of "sharing" entered our conversation.

Next in an almost 90 minute discussion with Ms. Upton and the Director of Human Resources, Dawne Cohn, I was asked directly how I would handle finding out that one of the portfolio managers was involved with illegal drugs or insider trading.  It wasn’t ambiguous. We discussed, at length, the dual role of coach and potential informant.  

This startled me. I had actually heard from a former SAC employee that Ari Kiev (the father of Marshall), the legendary psychiatrist who worked for SAC for almost two decades, was often seen as merely a “management conduit”. I still hadn’t anticipated that responsibility to be explicit.

Unless you want to begin experimenting with biomedical engineering, if you truly want to help a money manager improve, it’s imperative that you earn their unequivocal trust. They need to know they can safely tell you ANYTHING. If you don’t have that, then all the behavioral strategizing in the world isn’t going to result in bankable performance increases.

Boyle asked the best questions.  What would I do with someone who was great but didn’t want to risk any more capital and vise versa? What would I do with a volatile individual who risked every penny he was given - even when his capital had been reduced due to repeated blow-ups. Now this is the kind of stuff I can fix.   

Kiev mostly sat back. He leafed through Market Mind Games, turned immediately to the index and chided me for calling Cohen "Stevie". "He hates that, you know."

Despite my developing reservations about the job, I executed my best impression of the good old gridiron try. I followed up. I let them know competitors were asking me about the position and I explained again why ReThink’s team approach works best.

Not surprisingly, I didn’t get the job. I wasn’t a "cultural fit," per Ms. Upton.

I don’t know for a fact who did get the job.

There are however a couple of things I do know.

SAC is very serious about being notified of illegal behavior in the ranks – very serious.

Likewise, Cohen’s tape reading talent is real. I have a little bit of that talent myself and I have seen it with my own eyes in people like Dimitry Balyasny, CEO of Balyasny Asset Management, whom I had the privilege to sit next to back in the ‘90s at Schonfeld Securities.

And I’m certain that the SEC doesn’t understand that this is truly an art and is also now being described by the neuroscience research on trader intuition as "theory of mind".

The formerly open secret, now in the Wall Street Journal, is that Cohen is the target of an insider trading crackdown by the Justice Department. It’s easy to see that the ability to predict future price movement from current price movement can ONLY look like criminal behavior to a regulator.  But that talent doesn’t make "Stevie" guilty of anything.

As for the portfolio managers at SAC, the widely reported dictatorial culture at the firm certainly breeds desperation. Boyle, despite having an appreciation of the power of the unconscious mind, was likewise also just a bit too quick, in my opinion, to consider canning Mr. No-More-Risk and Mr. Too-Much-Risk.

If the psychological context of being inside SAC on a daily basis feels like an arctic chill then finding warmth via assembling the ingredients of a bonfire can seem like a good idea. If the management consultant discovers a smoldering fire and indeed executes on the “dialog with senior management” element, is the firm required to "confess" what it has discovered to regulators? What if I had gotten a maybe not so proverbial stab at helping the PM’s "perform at their full potential" and I did, despite the suspected subtext, manage to gain trust, would the SEC require ME to offer it up?

…which brings me back to the purple heart and the multi-billion dollar question.

Is Steve Cohen a trading-addicted introvert who admires bravery? Or, does that cherubic face hide a cold-hearted, control-freakish, exceedingly cunning crook? Isn’t that all anyone, even the government, really wants to know?

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »


Judging By The Numbers, Investors Don't Care About SAC Capital's Legal Troubles

$
0
0

steve cohen

Lawrence Delevingne of Hedge Fund Intelligencedoesn't believe that the recent indictment of former SAC Capital Advisors Mathew Martoma for insider trading, which reportedly might lead to SEC charges against the firm and CEO Steve Cohen, will cause investors to flee the hedge fund.

History tells him that SAC investors aren't fazed about these types of allegations.

Since 2010, the company's assets jumped from $12 billion to $14 billion "despite six people being tied to insider trading while working at SAC and three of them pleading guilty." All increases in assets took place before 2012, when the firm stopped accepting new capital.

Delevingne collects quotes from AR Magazine's "Inside SAC's shark tank," published shortly after the allegations, which demonstrate the bearish sentiment on SAC that never materialized in the marketplace:

"If I were sitting on the sidelines and considering an allocation, I would want to wait until the SEC has handed down their all-clear notice on the firm," said one institutional investor familiar with SAC in the story.

Added the chief investment officer for one prominent institution: "There's zero chance in my mind that SAC can go out and father a significant amount of institutional investor money," the person said. "If you're a plan sponsor, you're making zero dollars. So you say to yourself, "I'm not making enough money to take this kind of career risk?"

One fund of funds manager quoted in the 2010 story took an even harsher view. "The funds of funds know that if anyone at SAC actually gets charged, and anyone gets indicted, that the whole thing could go down in about a week--just like Galleon," the person said.

SAC's past resiliency to legal assaults may help it avoid an outflow of funds. However, as the New York Times notes, things might be different because "this is the first time the government has linked Mr. Cohen to questionable trades."

SEE ALSO: My Interview At SAC Capital Included An Awkward Discussion About Insider Trading

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's What Happened On SAC Capital's Conference Call This Afternoon

$
0
0

Steve Cohen Vanity Fair small

This afternoon, hedge Fund SAC Capital held its second conference call since a subsidiary hedge fund's manager, Mathew Martoma, was charged in the largest insider trading case in history.

The call was short, less than half an hour, but CNBC's Kate Kelly gave the low down on what happened.

  • SAC Founder Steve Cohen has not been charged with any wrongdoing.
  • That said, if SAC is liable for anything monetarily, investors will not have to pay anything out. The hedge fund has set things up so that Cohen will take the financial hit.
  • Cohen has been meeting individually with portfolio managers to make sure everyone is on the same page.

That's about it, folks.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Is Spying On Corporate Jets Insider Trading?

$
0
0

private jet tbiOne of the stranger aspects of Bloomberg's story about the FBI's Tip Machine, also known as former Morgan Stanley director David Slaine, is that one of his original tips involved a fund manager who was allegedly paying off people to discover who was coming in and out of Teterboro Airport, the small New Jersey airport catering to many New York area private corporate jets.

There are a number of things that makes this a strange start for a relationship that has led to the conviction of nearly a score of people on securities law violations. But the number one thing is this: paying off people to provide tips about the traffic at the airport is not illegal. And neither is trading off of those tips.

Most people who work at Teterboro are unlikely to be under any duty of confidentiality. They may freely discuss the who was using the airport, even if those people happen to be Very Important Investment Bankers. They may even speculate on what may have brought the VIIBs to Teterobor and buy and sell stocks based on that information.

What's more, buying that information is not illegal. Since the person originally possessing the information had no duty of confidentiality, there's no illegal tipping going on. Without any illegal tipping, there's no restriction on trading on the information. If the fund manager was, as Slaine claimed (and the fund manager denied), trading healthcare stocks based on this information, that was very likely perfectly legal.

There are, of course, some exceptions. Security personnel at check-points may be under a duty of confidentiality not to reveal information they garner from reviewing IDs. Airline employees may also be under a duty not to reveal this information. But these are a small subset of all sorts of other people in and around the airport who could supply the information to a fund manager looking for an edge.

This seems to be a case of confusing someone obtaining material, non-public information for the purposes of trading with the illicit acquisition of that kind information. 

What makes this situation even more absurd is that paying off people at the airport would have been completely unnecessary. You don't need to pay anyone to track traffic at Teterboro. You can do it all on the web.

Here's a quick tutorial. The first thing you do is go to the FAA aircraft registration database. Every single plane the flies in the United States is registered in the database. You can look up a plane's registration numbers by its owner's name. What you get is a registration number that begins with the letter N.

The next thing you do is go to a service like FlightAware.com, enter the tail number into its private plane tracker. What you get is a page with the departure, arrival, and duration information about all of its recent flights.

Let's say you want to know where executives from SAC Capital are flying. Type SAC Capital into the FAA database and it spits out a Gulf Stream IV with registration number N498QS. Enter that number into FlightAware and you learn that the SAC Capital plane flew from Palm Springs, Florida to Hawaii's Kona International Airport on November 23rd. The plane traveled to the Boeing Field/King County International Airport in Seattle the next day, where it spent most of Thanksgiving week. It departing on Friday, November 30th for Dallas. On Monday, December 3, it left Dallas for Las Vegas.

Now you have to be cautious about this sort of thing. The plane we're tracking here is only partially owned by SAC Capital, according to FAA records. There are nine other owners of the plane listed, including the Wilmington Trust Company. So you have to do a little bit more deductive detective work to determine which owners are most likely to have used the plane to reach which destinations.

The corporate owners of planes hate that this information is available. They would prefer to have their flight information blocked from public viewing. But the Department of Transportation has ruled the "privacy concerns" are not legitimate reasons to hide flight information. Instead, companies must provide written certification detailing security threats that justify concealing the flight information.

Back when I was at DealBreaker, we had a regular feature called "Planespotting." We regularly tracked the planes that belonged, in whole or in part, to notable people in finance and business, inviting readers to speculate the reasons for various flights. Why, we wondered, was United Healthcare making so many flights between Teterboro and St. Paul? What was the Gulfstream IV owned by Thomas H. Lee Management doing in Denver? What had the SAC Capital Gulfstream been doing up in Boston?

We invited our readers to try to formulate serious and humorous reasons for these trips. Perhaps so-and-so had a mistress in this city. Or an executive loved the golf course in another city. Or, maybe, the guys from private equity company X were flying into a certain city to have takeover talks with the local distressed public company. For some reason that I don't quite recall, we started measuring trips according to the number of "dead hookers" that could be on board. It was fun.

To get back on track, my point is that it would be almost impossible to violate securities laws by tracking traffic at Teterboro because that information is not even non-public. It's public information available for anyone who takes the time to search a couple of websites.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Steve Cohen's SAC Capital Flagship Fund Is Up 12% YTD

$
0
0

steve cohen

Steve Cohen's SAC Capital Advisors' flagship fund is up 12% YTD through the end of November, CNBC's Kate Kelly just reported on "Fast Money: Half Time Report" moments ago.

That's much better than the average hedge fund's performance this year, which is about 2 to 3% YTD returns, Kelly pointed out.  

That being said, SAC could possibly face redemptions from investors.   

SAC has been put on "watch" by Citigroup, Kelly reported.

Basically, this means the bank is watching what's going on at SAC and may or may not remove it from its hedge fund platform.  Morgan Stanley has also put SAC on watch, according to CNBC.

Last month, former SAC portfolio manger Mathew Martoma was charged in what is believed to be "the most lucrative" insider trading scheme ever. Martoma worked at CR Intrinsic Investors, a subsidiary of SAC.  

Martoma has been accused of using negative confidential drug trial info in pharmaceutical companies, Elan Corporation and Wyeth, between the summer 2006 and mid-July 2008. 

In the complaint against Martoma, there are several mentions of "Portfolio Manger A."Cohen was fingered in several media reports as "Portfolio Manager A."  

Last week, SAC held a conference call with investors and Cohen, who opened the call, said he's confident he acted appropriately.  

Cohen has not been charged or accused of any wrongdoing.  

During the call, SAC disclosed to clients that the hedge fund had received a Wells Notice from the SEC indicating that SAC could face civil charges.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

REPORT: Citi Advising Clients Not To Put More Money In SAC Capital

$
0
0

Steve Cohen

Bloomberg News' red headline just crossed saying, "Citi is said to advise clients from adding money to SAC."

CNBC's Kate Kelly reported on "Fast Money: Half Time Report" moments ago that SAC Capital Advisors has been placed on "watch" by Citigroup.  

This means that Citi's private bank is watching what's going on at SAC and may or may not remove it from its hedge fund platform, Kelly reported. 

Morgan Stanley has also put SAC on watch, according to CNBC.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 197 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>